Search Site
Menu
It may be after the fact but…

A common theme in representing victims of accidents, especially those injuries that occur on premises, is that the landowner or other entity in control of the property may change the conditions that gave rise to the accident after it occurred. Certainly, then, it is imperative for the lawyer to video or photograph the scene as soon as he/she has been retained. What about introducing in evidence—or using to influence a settlement—a subsequent remedial repair? In this context, the subsequent repair is obviously referring to the repair that takes places post-accident. That repair attempts to improve the safety of the premises. Isn’t that relevant to show negligence? As usual, the law has a nuanced response to that question, for it may be relevant, but allowing that evidence to be presented may inhibit future repairs because of the legal implications. Consequently, the rule against the admission of subsequent remedial repairs, in effect in almost all jurisdictions, has developed to exclude the admission of such evidence. The rule has developed to further the public policy in allowing for repairs, i.e. improved safety.

But, as I say, the rule is nuanced. Although the general rule is that post-accident improvements are not admissible to show negligence, there are exceptions if the evidence is offered to show feasibility, control, or is used for impeachment. As the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts has observed, improved safety design does not become inadmissible merely because a defendant chose to concede in a general way that design improvements were practical. do Canto v. Ametek, 367 Mass. 774 (1974) Thus, despite what you may think, the additional light, the strengthened hand rail, the changed composition of the floor may all aid in the resolution of your case.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Feinberg & Alban, P.C. fervently protects your rights
  • The Boston firm of Feinberg & Alban, P.C. specializes its practice in the area of personal injury.

    The attorneys serve the entire state of Massachusetts in addition to affiliating with lawyers in other states to handle cases outside of Massachusetts.

  • $7.7 Million Award for Feinberg & Alban Client in Personal Injury Trial

    Boston Attorneys Win Highest Injury Verdict in Massachusetts in 2011 & 2012.

Client Reviews
  • google
    5.0/5.0

    Marsha Alban is a great attorney and very easy to work with!

    Read more

    Lana Bautin

  • google
    5.0/5.0

    I have had the pleasure of working with Attorney Santora several times, and she has never let me down. She is professional, compassionate, knowledgeable, and always keeps my best interest at the forefront. I have recommended her to friends without he...

    Read more

    Brian Orsatti

  • google
    5.0/5.0

    I highly recommend Marsha! From start to finish was just as easy as a law process can be. No words to explain how wonderful all of them are. Highly proportional and caring. All questions answered , all problems resolved. Thank you ! Look no more. Thi...

    Read more

    Katerina Zhantuan

  • lawyers
    5.0/5.0

    Marsha and Paula were nice to work with. Both of these women were top notched. I enjoyed being updated on my case without the usual hassles of emailing and continuously leaving voice mails. Working with these two women were stress free and that was v...

    Read more

    Client

  • google
    5.0/5.0

    Attorney Santora was very attentive to the details of my case. She was prompt in returning either phone calls or emails. Her expertise aided me in making a decision. It was a pleasure to have her represent me.

    Read more

    Karen Trahan

See all reviews
Awards & Affiliations
Contact us

Quick Contact Form