Search Site
Menu
Monthly Archive
April 2012
61 - 70 of 75
Page 7 of 8

Key areas in any personal injury case

There are several key areas to any law firm’s successful handling of these cases: Thorough understanding of insurance law including an ability to process and “coordinate” automobile insurance with health insurance. Thorough understanding of Medicare, Medicaid, and the rights of private health insurers to be repaid. You do not want a case resolved only to Read More

Read More

The Personal Injury Plaintiff as Consumer

A weapon in Massachusetts personal injury cases is our Consumer Protection Statute, 93A. Passed in the late 1970’s, this is a tool that may have originally been designed to aid the consumer in his/her fight against the retailer for unfair and deceptive acts or practices in commerce. Over the years, it has also been used Read More

Read More

Case Values and Scarring

Pricing personal injury cases is not easy. Having said that, experienced attorneys will often put a value on cases in amazingly similar amounts. Lawyers will also ask other lawyers who they respect to “price” their case. Sort of a blind taste test if you will. The difference in assessments is often not great. The most Read More

Read More

Of Natasha Richardson, Head Injuries, Helmets and Evidence

The recent tragedy involving Natasha Richardson has brought to light the science of head injuries, particularly with respect to epidural hematomas and skull fractures. Fortunately, the vast majority of such injuries do not have such a terrible outcome. Nevertheless, her sad case should cause insurers to concede the seriousness of these accidents, even if the Read More

Read More

Harm to the Consumer

An unfortunate twentieth anniversary has just passed. A law that went into effect on January 1, 1989 greatly curtailed the rights of Massachusetts auto accident victims. This concerned uninsurance and underinsurance motorist coverage. The Legislature passed a bill, called the Massachusetts Auto Insurance Reform Act, signed by Governor Michael Dukakis, which eliminated stacking of policies Read More

Read More

Alternative Dispute Resolution? It Depends

I am forever asking people in business how their work has changed since their career began. Let me offer my opinion on the sea change in personal injury law. The prevalence of alternative dispute resolution- arbitration and mediation has quickened the resolution of cases and has made their processing cheaper. Those are significant advantages. When Read More

Read More

When Two Chances or Two Bites Will Do

How many times have we heard that “you only get one chance in life” or “you only get one bite of the apple?” We have been told this countless times. In an on-the-job injury those adages may not be quite true. A worker cannot sue his/her employer. Our workman’s compensation statute provides the employer with Read More

Read More

Of Children and Comparative Negligence

If a child wanders onto a construction site and falls injuring himself/herself, how do we assess the child’s conduct? We do not have “attractive nuisance” in Massachusetts, unlike many other jurisdictions. We do have a statute, MGLc 231 § 85Q governing trespassing children which sets out five criteria for negligence not unlike attractive nuisance. As Read More

Read More

Disinterested Is to Uninterested as Indifferent Is to Uncaring

In follow up to my last blog post about words of legal significance, I am reminded of the following word: disinterested. Often that word is confused with uninterested. To not care is to be uninterested. To be impartial is to be disinterested, not favoring either side. Obviously we want our judges and juries to be Read More

Read More

To Infer or to Imply

When a person opens an umbrella what does that tell us about the weather? When a ship’s captain brings aboard his wife and children what does that say about what he thinks of the seaworthiness of the vessel? These are classic examples of conduct from which we make inferences. Indeed, Judges instruct jurors that inference Read More

Read More
61 - 70 of 75
Page 7 of 8
Feinberg & Alban, P.C. fervently protects your rights
  • The Boston firm of Feinberg & Alban, P.C. specializes its practice in the area of personal injury.

    The attorneys serve the entire state of Massachusetts in addition to affiliating with lawyers in other states to handle cases outside of Massachusetts.

  • $7.7 Million Award for Feinberg & Alban Client in Personal Injury Trial

    Boston Attorneys Win Highest Injury Verdict in Massachusetts in 2011 & 2012.

Client Reviews
  • google
    5.0/5.0

    Colleen was great to deal with and communication was easy.

    Read more

    Graham Eyres

  • google
    5.0/5.0

    Colleen represented both my daughter and myself in a car accident case. It was a tricky and very involved case with many detail oriented issues to deal with. She handled everything with confidence and grace and supported us through what were some ver...

    Read more

    Rhonda Brouder

  • google
    5.0/5.0

    I’m a college student in the Boston area who suffered a pedestrian personal injury in December of 2022. Thankfully I was put into contact with Feinberg & Alban PC and I worked closely with Robert and Perry Feinberg who treated me with respect and f...

    Read more

    Anne O'Leary

  • google
    5.0/5.0

    Alexis Cahill was great, professional, and was open for me to contact on any questions I may have had during the process. Feinberg & Alban PC's services were nice as well, and I'd recommend them due to the transparency, what they were able to negotia...

    Read more

    Branden B.

  • google
    5.0/5.0

    My mom had a great experience with Feinberg as her attorney, after she fell near her house, and he took her under his wing. Mr. Feinberg was helpful, very organized and kind. He helped my mom a lot, very happy with results

    Read more

    Jane sungurov

See all reviews
Awards & Affiliations
Contact us

Quick Contact Form