Search Site
Menu

Presenting the Case


How do I put a case together? How do I present it in a comprehensive and thorough fashion to get the best result that I can for my personal injury client? Having done this for a number of years now, I have very strong feelings about how to answer those questions. It really involves a multi-disciplinary approach. I have recently blogged about brain injuries so I will focus on that injury in describing to you how I think your case should best be presented. The lessons can be applied to all forms of injury law.

You want a blend of several features. You want to draw heavily upon objective evidence. What is objective evidence in a brain injury? It is imaging studies. I have spoken about that in a few recent blogs. The imaging studies are the CT scans that are done acutely – that is at the time of the injury – and later on in the course of the injury. In looking for more detailed and specific evidence of an injury, the treating doctor may prescribe MRIs of the brain. There may also be neuropsychological testing or cognitive testing. That too is a form of objective evidence. Then, of course, you want to see how the client presents in a clinical fashion to the neurologist. What are the neurologist’s opinions? Some of them will be based on objective facts and some degree of subjectivity will enter into the picture.

Before you know it, you will have already retained three experts in the case. To summarize: the imaging is interpreted, in the case of a brain or spine injury, by a neuroradiologist; there are cognitive tests done by the neuropsychologist; and the final expert is the neurologist. That is a very good start. You can certainly add to that from the fields of physiatry (not psychiatry but physiatry), psychiatry, life care planning and vocational rehabilitation.

Having discussed experts the question remains: how do you comprehensively and thoroughly present the injury? To round out the picture, you will also need lay testimony or lay evidence. Who are those people? Who would best know about the client’s pre-accident state as compared with the client’s post-accident state? Those would be family and friends. Those lay witnesses can be extremely, extremely important. They work together or mesh with the objective evidence and the expert testimony.

When I summarize a case I want to be able to draw upon a number of things that convey in a forceful fashion the strength and conviction that I feel for my client’s case. I like to use the following words, if at all possible: “irrefutable evidence”, “a very high degree (according to the doctor’s) medical certainty”, “by every objective test”, to name several convincing terms. Those are keywords and they should be impressive to the other side. Of course, on the other side are the people with the money, the insurance claims adjusters and defense counsel. When you summarize a case generally, you want to speak about how likable the client is, how the client has a very good and strong personal narrative, and how they have support from lay and expert witnesses. It is on that basis that you can describe the pre-accident state, the injury up to the point of settlement or trial, and project into the future on the client’s medical situation.

Assume you have liability in your favor. If you are able to describe the injury, how the client sustained it (the so-called mechanism of injury) and its effects you have done a good job. If you can also project the long-term implications of the injury, and if you are able to do it in quite definitive terms, then you will be in an even better position. You will be poised to achieve the best result possible for that personal injury client.

Feinberg & Alban, P.C. fervently protects your rights
  • The Boston firm of Feinberg & Alban, P.C. specializes its practice in the area of personal injury.

    The attorneys serve the entire state of Massachusetts in addition to affiliating with lawyers in other states to handle cases outside of Massachusetts.

  • $7.7 Million Award for Feinberg & Alban Client in Personal Injury Trial

    Boston Attorneys Win Highest Injury Verdict in Massachusetts in 2011 & 2012.

Client Reviews
  • google
    5.0/5.0

    Attorney Colleen Santora was amazing! I was hit by a car, completely overwhelmed and really just needed to focus on getting better. Retaining her, truly gave me peace of mind that all of the upcoming medical bills would be taken care of. I healed ...

    Read more

    Hillary Nelson

  • google
    5.0/5.0

    While visiting boston, my husband was injured and required surgery, and the tribulations that followed. Living out of state, we had NO idea what to do, and we needed guidance. Collen and her team were and ARE a God sent. Colleen answered all of ...

    Read more

    Catherine Connor

  • google
    5.0/5.0

    I worked with Colleen Santora and had a great experience! I was very overwhelmed after my injury (MBTA at fault) and she made the process clear and easy. She always answered any questions I had and answered my emails within minutes every time. She al...

    Read more

    Farwa Faheem

  • google
    5.0/5.0

    On vacation my mother had an accident in the Boston Airport that required surgery and prolonged physical therapy. It was a long, painful and extremely stressful process. My mother felt hopeless and her chronic pain was debilitating. My mother finally...

    Read more

    Jackie Salyers

  • google
    5.0/5.0

    Robert Feinberg was an absolute delight to work with. My car accident was a horrific experience. Robert and his team secured the top dollar settlement possible for my case. It was a great decision to work with his team, from the very first com...

    Read more

    David Flood

See all reviews
Awards & Affiliations
Contact us

Quick Contact Form

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.