In any case, regardless of its complexity, as the injured person’s advocate, your lawyer must know the background of the General Contractor. When was the company established? Does it specialize in the type of project, for example a commercial building, involved in the client’s accident? How many employees does it have? How many projects has it handled and across how many states?
As discussed in the last blog, the face of the project is the Project Superintendent or Project Manager. Often, he/she is the only representative of the General Contractor on the site. What is his/her background? And how does it compare to the other Project Managers or Project Superintendents employed by the General Contractor?
An informed review of the defendant’s background is important. But where do we learn about the specifics of the conduct that is expected? The following are sources that your construction accident attorney should use to make a thorough presentation of this issue:
Let’s run through the bullet points in the above in a little more detail.
The American Institute of Architects provisions are contained in a contract, the Standard Form of Agreement Between Owner and General Contractor. They set out obligations with respect to safety on the part of the General Contractor, including the duty of “initiating, maintaining and supervising safety.” That phrase is in the contract and it is powerful.
In a Facilities Safety Agreement signed by the Owner and GC, the Owner may emphasize that they expected the most stringent safety regulations possible to be utilized on the jobsite. Maybe their regulations even exceed OSHA regulations. Great. The more stringent rules will take precedence.
As if that weren’t enough, the Owner’s witnesses should testify that the GC was “the single source of responsibility.” The GC would have acquiesced to that standard; not agreeing to them means not getting the job.
Corporation Project Safety Manual: It is not uncommon to find great language in a company’s manual. For example: “Safety ultimately ends up with us”; “One lax moment in terms of safety may result in a lifetime of needless pain and suffering. Disregarding safety standards may even be fatal.”
Good industry practice: It is common knowledge in the construction industry that the General Contractor is responsible for safety. In some circumstances, a level of oversight is expected even greater than would normally be the case:
Testimony will be that the level of oversight by the superintendent should be commensurate with the superintendent’s knowledge of the subcontractor’s history, including of course that subcontractor’s safety record. That is good common sense. But it is not simply common sense. That expectation is contained in OSHA publications on multi-employer responsibility. That makes this even more powerful.
The attorneys serve the entire state of Massachusetts in addition to affiliating with lawyers in other states to handle cases outside of Massachusetts.
Boston Attorneys Win Highest Injury Verdict in Massachusetts in 2011 & 2012.