Search Site
Menu
Evidence, Evidence, Evidence

It is often said that the three most important factors in assessing the value of real estate are location, location, location. Well, the three most important factors in assessing the liability of a case are evidence, evidence, evidence.

What about hearsay – the biggest impediment to introducing evidence? Hearsay, as many of you know, is defined as an out of court statement offered to prove the truth of the matter asserted. That definition opens the door to exceptions and provides fertile grounds for the imaginative lawyer. The first consideration is that, for the most part, hearsay pertains to spoken words. (Non-verbal conduct intended as an assertion is, however, hearsay.) Observations of a testifying witness, therefore, are not hearsay. However, if those observations are instead introduced through a report, the report is itself hearsay.

How then does the aforementioned imaginative lawyer use exceptions? Statements of a party to a lawsuit are admissions of a party opponent and are admissible. (The Federal Rules of Evidence define admissions as non-hearsay but effectively the result is the same.) Other exceptions, numbering almost two dozen, are useful because, if properly used, will result in the admission in evidence of those out of court statements offered to prove the truth of the matter asserted.

Those exceptions, it seems to me (a personal injury attorney in Boston), are grounded in one enduring principle: they have an indicia of reliability such that the admission of such evidence has an element of trustworthiness. Hearsay has to come within an exception as the proffered statement, when made, was neither under oath nor subject to cross-examination.

Defining whether something is hearsay and whether the statement/declaration falls within an exception can be complex. A proper assessment can go a long toward determining whether your case is a winner.

Click here to get the latest headlines from Robert Feinberg.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Feinberg & Alban, P.C. fervently protects your rights
  • The Boston firm of Feinberg & Alban, P.C. specializes its practice in the area of personal injury.

    The attorneys serve the entire state of Massachusetts in addition to affiliating with lawyers in other states to handle cases outside of Massachusetts.

  • $7.7 Million Award for Feinberg & Alban Client in Personal Injury Trial

    Boston Attorneys Win Highest Injury Verdict in Massachusetts in 2011 & 2012.

Client Reviews
  • lawyers
    5.0/5.0

    Working with this firm was a great experience, they were very attentive to my case and needs ; the results of my case was better that I expected. Thanks to much to all the lawyers involved Sincerely S. Ponce

    Read more

    Client

  • google
    5.0/5.0

    I loved collaborating with my attorney. From day one it felt like teamwork: us against the world, david vs. goliath. There was an easy rapport, free flow of communication, yet she remained the consummate professional at all times. As a first-time pla...

    Read more

    Oyie Ndzie

  • google
    5.0/5.0

    Excellent Firm! I cannot give enough praise to Colleen Santora who handled our case . Responsive, professional a true attorney who cares. The entire firm put it all together however Colleen brought it all to the table . Five stars does not seem to sa...

    Read more

    ed thomas

  • google
    5.0/5.0

    Atty Santora & staff were very responsive and handled my personal injury case with concern and professional care. I will recommend this firm for legal services.

    Read more

    Regina Benton

  • google
    5.0/5.0

    I had a wonderful experience working with Robert Feinberg and Colleen Santoro. I never once had doubts about how my case would be handled. I knew I was in great hands with both of them. I was always informed and felt confident in their ability to re...

    Read more

    Betsy Rose

See all reviews
Awards & Affiliations
Contact us

Quick Contact Form