Search Site
Menu

Implications of a settlement with one of two (or more) defendants.

In the chess match that can take place in the course of litigating personal injury cases, one topic has especially fascinated me. It involves the situation where you sue two defendants but settle prior to the trial with one of them. The Supreme Judicial Court has clarified an ambiguity which carried into the 1990s. That clarification, in the case of Morea v. Cosco, Inc., 422 Mass. 601 (1996), prohibits the fact of a settlement to come into evidence in a trial against the remaining defendant. To be sure, there are exceptions where this exclusion will not apply. For the most part, however, the rule establishes that the settlement is not admissible. The Supreme Judicial Court made this decision so that settlements can be encouraged with one party. Also, the adjustment for the settlement will be done by the judge as there has to be an offset for the amount that was paid to the plaintiff by the settling tortfeasor. The Massachusetts’s Guide to Evidence, Rule 408, codifies the rule of Morea v. Cosco.

All of this is heartwarming news to plaintiffs. It affords flexibility for there may be times when a resolution against one defendant is preferred. In other circumstances, it may be that the injured party may prefer to have both defendants in the trial of the personal injury action. However, it is always nice to have the choice and your lawyer can advise you, the injured party, which is the preferred strategy. Happily, if it turns out that the better approach is to settle against Defendant 1 while leaving the case open against Defendant 2 – probably the more common approach – the evidentiary implications are known in advance.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Feinberg & Alban, P.C. fervently protects your rights
  • The Boston firm of Feinberg & Alban, P.C. specializes its practice in the area of personal injury.

    The attorneys serve the entire state of Massachusetts in addition to affiliating with lawyers in other states to handle cases outside of Massachusetts.

  • $7.7 Million Award for Feinberg & Alban Client in Personal Injury Trial

    Boston Attorneys Win Highest Injury Verdict in Massachusetts in 2011 & 2012.

Client Reviews
  • lawyers
    5.0/5.0

    Alexis Cahill represented me on a personal injury case. I was hurt in A car accident and I could not be happier with the outcome Alexis was able to achieve for me. She was conscientious, answered all my questions In a timely manner, and was very eas...

    Read more

    Client

  • google
    5.0/5.0

    I reached out to Feinberg & Alban thru their website. Robert Feinberg called me back the same day. He made me feel important and very comfortable. Colleen Santora was the attorney on my case and she was fantastic! She kept me well informed through ou...

    Read more

    Vern Quashie

  • google
    5.0/5.0

    Attorney Colleen Santora, was a pleasure to work with throughout my personal injury case. She makes the process seamless for her clients and is there to answer any questions you have. She negotiated every aspect of my case and got me the settlement I...

    Read more

    Cody

  • google
    5.0/5.0

    We were very pleased with all aspects of this law firm! My husband was struck by a truck while crossing the street. We hired attorney Colleen Santora of Feinberg & Alban PC. Colleen immediately showed empathy towards my husbands condition, aside fro...

    Read more

    Cleopatra Anderson

  • google
    5.0/5.0

    Attorney Colleen Santora assisted me after a terrifying highway incident. She came to my home because I was not able to travel, and she remained compassionate, professional, and highly competent throughout my case. I would highly recommend retaining...

    Read more

    Susan Hawes

See all reviews
Awards & Affiliations
Contact us

Quick Contact Form