Search Site
Menu

Implications of a settlement with one of two (or more) defendants.

In the chess match that can take place in the course of litigating personal injury cases, one topic has especially fascinated me. It involves the situation where you sue two defendants but settle prior to the trial with one of them. The Supreme Judicial Court has clarified an ambiguity which carried into the 1990s. That clarification, in the case of Morea v. Cosco, Inc., 422 Mass. 601 (1996), prohibits the fact of a settlement to come into evidence in a trial against the remaining defendant. To be sure, there are exceptions where this exclusion will not apply. For the most part, however, the rule establishes that the settlement is not admissible. The Supreme Judicial Court made this decision so that settlements can be encouraged with one party. Also, the adjustment for the settlement will be done by the judge as there has to be an offset for the amount that was paid to the plaintiff by the settling tortfeasor. The Massachusetts’s Guide to Evidence, Rule 408, codifies the rule of Morea v. Cosco.

All of this is heartwarming news to plaintiffs. It affords flexibility for there may be times when a resolution against one defendant is preferred. In other circumstances, it may be that the injured party may prefer to have both defendants in the trial of the personal injury action. However, it is always nice to have the choice and your lawyer can advise you, the injured party, which is the preferred strategy. Happily, if it turns out that the better approach is to settle against Defendant 1 while leaving the case open against Defendant 2 – probably the more common approach – the evidentiary implications are known in advance.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Feinberg & Alban, P.C. fervently protects your rights
  • The Boston firm of Feinberg & Alban, P.C. specializes its practice in the area of personal injury.

    The attorneys serve the entire state of Massachusetts in addition to affiliating with lawyers in other states to handle cases outside of Massachusetts.

  • $7.7 Million Award for Feinberg & Alban Client in Personal Injury Trial

    Boston Attorneys Win Highest Injury Verdict in Massachusetts in 2011 & 2012.

Client Reviews
  • google
    5.0/5.0

    Attorney Colleen Santora was amazing! I was hit by a car, completely overwhelmed and really just needed to focus on getting better. Retaining her, truly gave me peace of mind that all of the upcoming medical bills would be taken care of. I healed ...

    Read more

    Hillary Nelson

  • google
    5.0/5.0

    While visiting boston, my husband was injured and required surgery, and the tribulations that followed. Living out of state, we had NO idea what to do, and we needed guidance. Collen and her team were and ARE a God sent. Colleen answered all of ...

    Read more

    Catherine Connor

  • google
    5.0/5.0

    I worked with Colleen Santora and had a great experience! I was very overwhelmed after my injury (MBTA at fault) and she made the process clear and easy. She always answered any questions I had and answered my emails within minutes every time. She al...

    Read more

    Farwa Faheem

  • google
    5.0/5.0

    On vacation my mother had an accident in the Boston Airport that required surgery and prolonged physical therapy. It was a long, painful and extremely stressful process. My mother felt hopeless and her chronic pain was debilitating. My mother finally...

    Read more

    Jackie Salyers

  • google
    5.0/5.0

    Robert Feinberg was an absolute delight to work with. My car accident was a horrific experience. Robert and his team secured the top dollar settlement possible for my case. It was a great decision to work with his team, from the very first com...

    Read more

    David Flood

See all reviews
Awards & Affiliations
Contact us

Quick Contact Form

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.