Search Site
Menu
In Personal Injury the Fed Looks to the State

In a recent blog, I wrote of the inability to use the federal courts to gain jurisdiction over a defendant who does not have sufficient minimum contacts with the forum state. That blog was in response to the misperception of many that all a litigant needs to do is to sue in federal court to gain jurisdiction over any defendant. Not true. Because the federal court applies the same analysis on jurisdiction that the state in which it sits would apply, there is no advantage in that instance to bringing an action in a federal court. Consequently, if you didn’t have jurisdiction over a particular defendant in state court in Massachusetts, you would not have jurisdiction over that same defendant in federal court in Massachusetts.

In a similar vein, if you are able to bring an action in federal court for personal injury – because of diversity of citizenship between the parties – and you have jurisdiction over the defendant, would the federal court apply the same principles of tort law that the state in which it sits applies?  The answer is yes. The United States District Court in Massachusetts for example will look to the tort cases of the Supreme Judicial Court and the Massachusetts Appeals Court to determine the relevant law. There is no benefit to forum shopping as there is no federal common law. In the seminal case of Erie v. Tompkins, 304 U.S. 64 (1938), the Supreme Court ruled that in cases of diversity jurisdiction, the courts had to use the same laws as the states in which they were situated. This has allowed for a uniform application of laws.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Feinberg & Alban, P.C. fervently protects your rights
  • The Boston firm of Feinberg & Alban, P.C. specializes its practice in the area of personal injury.

    The attorneys serve the entire state of Massachusetts in addition to affiliating with lawyers in other states to handle cases outside of Massachusetts.

  • $7.7 Million Award for Feinberg & Alban Client in Personal Injury Trial

    Boston Attorneys Win Highest Injury Verdict in Massachusetts in 2011 & 2012.

Client Reviews
  • lawyers
    5.0/5.0

    Working with this firm was a great experience, they were very attentive to my case and needs ; the results of my case was better that I expected. Thanks to much to all the lawyers involved Sincerely S. Ponce

    Read more

    Client

  • google
    5.0/5.0

    I loved collaborating with my attorney. From day one it felt like teamwork: us against the world, david vs. goliath. There was an easy rapport, free flow of communication, yet she remained the consummate professional at all times. As a first-time pla...

    Read more

    Oyie Ndzie

  • google
    5.0/5.0

    Excellent Firm! I cannot give enough praise to Colleen Santora who handled our case . Responsive, professional a true attorney who cares. The entire firm put it all together however Colleen brought it all to the table . Five stars does not seem to sa...

    Read more

    ed thomas

  • google
    5.0/5.0

    Atty Santora & staff were very responsive and handled my personal injury case with concern and professional care. I will recommend this firm for legal services.

    Read more

    Regina Benton

  • google
    5.0/5.0

    I had a wonderful experience working with Robert Feinberg and Colleen Santoro. I never once had doubts about how my case would be handled. I knew I was in great hands with both of them. I was always informed and felt confident in their ability to re...

    Read more

    Betsy Rose

See all reviews
Awards & Affiliations
Contact us

Quick Contact Form