Search Site
Menu
Admissions by Party Opponents vs. Declarations Against Interests

In my last blog, I wrote of the rule pertaining to admissions of party opponents, 801(d)(2) of the Federal Rules of Evidence and the Massachusetts Guide to Evidence. Let’s contrast that to Rule 804(b)(3)’s declarations against interests exception. The most fundamental difference between these two exceptions is that in the first exception the declarant must be an opposing party, whereas in the second exception, the declarant can be any relevant person to the case who is unavailable to testify at the trial.

However, the most significant difference between the two exceptions is that Rule 801(d)(2) allows any prior statement made by the declarant to be introduced whereas Rule 804(b)(3) only allows those statements which cut against the declarant’s interests. For a statement to be against the declarant’s interests, it must be one that a reasonable person would only make if they believed that statement to be true at the time it was said.

In civil cases– and personal injury law is my focus– we often encounter admissions by party opponents, but hardly ever, if at all, encounter declarations against interests. The admissions by party opponents exception allows for a broader scope of declarations. Sometimes it is said that a particular thought or person is a mile wide and an inch deep. I have found admissions of party opponents to be a mile wide and, happily, a mile deep.

 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Feinberg & Alban, P.C. fervently protects your rights
  • The Boston firm of Feinberg & Alban, P.C. specializes its practice in the area of personal injury.

    The attorneys serve the entire state of Massachusetts in addition to affiliating with lawyers in other states to handle cases outside of Massachusetts.

  • $7.7 Million Award for Feinberg & Alban Client in Personal Injury Trial

    Boston Attorneys Win Highest Injury Verdict in Massachusetts in 2011 & 2012.

Client Reviews
  • google
    5.0/5.0

    Robert Feinberg and his team were nothing short of stellar. They were prompt in all communications, insulated me from complications with insurances while I recovered from my injuries, and produced a favorable outcome after all was said and done. Ver...

    Read more

    Nigel Mathes

  • google
    5.0/5.0

    Great communication and follow up. Responsive to my needs and positive result's !

    Read more

    Chris Connor

  • google
    5.0/5.0

    They went the extra mile. Stood behind me. Had a difficult claim with a motor vehicle accident. I'm very satisfied with the outcome. Richard

    Read more

    richard turk

  • google
    5.0/5.0

    We have had the pleasure of working with Colleen Santora on couple legal issues. We have always had a good communication during our very long process. We feel good responsive, open,& honest communication during a injury case should be the strongest ...

    Read more

    Edward Hyde

  • google
    5.0/5.0

    Very professional firm, always pay attention to detail. Knowledgeable and successful. Written on behalf of Mikhail Zaytsev.

    Read more

    Yelena Wise

See all reviews
Awards & Affiliations
Contact us

Quick Contact Form