Search Site
Menu

Distinctions with a difference: present sense impressions vs. excited utterances

Though they seem similar, there are clear and definitive differences between Rule 803(1) Present Sense Impressions and Rule 803(2) Excited Utterances. If applied correctly, each rule provides an exception to the the rule against hearsay. The former is used in court in the trial of a personal injury case far more than the latter. The present sense impression exception involves a “statement describing or explaining an event or condition, made while or immediately after the declarant perceived it”. The rule has two conditions which must be met: first, that the statement explains or describes the event, and second that it is made during or immediately after the event. The excited utterance exception involves “a statement relating to a startling event or condition, made while the declarant was under the stress of excitement that it caused.” Likewise, this rule also has two conditions which must be met: first, that the declarant speaks while excited– under the “ambit of excitement”– by the event and second, that the excited speech “relates” to the event.

The major difference between the two exceptions is the factors which limit their applicability. The present sense impression exception is very much related to time, requiring either that the statement was made during the event or immediately afterwards . Otherwise, the relationship between the description and the event loses credibility. It is for this reason that the rule prohibits any statement of memory or belief. The excited utterance exception requires that the person is still in an excited state when the statement is made.

Don’t forget that neither of these exceptions– as so often happens in law– cannot come into play until the requisite foundation has been laid.

 

 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Feinberg & Alban, P.C. fervently protects your rights
  • The Boston firm of Feinberg & Alban, P.C. specializes its practice in the area of personal injury.

    The attorneys serve the entire state of Massachusetts in addition to affiliating with lawyers in other states to handle cases outside of Massachusetts.

  • $7.7 Million Award for Feinberg & Alban Client in Personal Injury Trial

    Boston Attorneys Win Highest Injury Verdict in Massachusetts in 2011 & 2012.

Client Reviews
  • lawyers
    5.0/5.0

    I will be forever grateful to Robert and his team at Feinberg & Alban, P.C. He is the best of the best and I truly cannot recommend his expertise enough. Having Robert represent me brought me great comfort. I never once doubted that he would not be s...

    Read more

    Client

  • google
    5.0/5.0

    Robert and his team were unbelievably caring and thorough in working on my interests. It was a very serious case. It needed much attention and skill. Robert and his team were always there for me from the time I was in the hospital. They got me an ama...

    Read more

    Jason Lebovitz

  • google
    5.0/5.0

    I suffered injuries and total loss if my car last year in a head on collision. Colleen Santora took my case and fought well on my behalf. She thoroughly answered all my questions and concerns, always responding in a quick and timely manner. She helpe...

    Read more

    Jessica Matt

  • google
    5.0/5.0

    Choosing Feinberg & Alban was probably one of the best decisions I ever took. Robert Feinberg and Perry Feinberg are amazing in their professionalism as well as in compassion. Perry was the lead attorney for me. He was always responsive to any questi...

    Read more

    Raja Bhattacharyya

  • google
    5.0/5.0

    I would like to express my gratitude to Feinberg & Alban PC. They are great people and professionals. If you need an attorney these are your guys. Thank you so much! Tatiana

    Read more

    Tatiana Andreeva

See all reviews
Awards & Affiliations
Contact us

Quick Contact Form