Search Site
Menu
Prejudice, Confusion and Waste of Time

Rule 403 of the Federal Rules of Evidence and the Massachusetts Guide to Evidence empowers judges to exclude evidence, which may pass the relevancy test (a rule of evidence explored in one of our previous blogs), but nevertheless unfairly biases jurors towards one side or the other, confuses them, or simply wastes the court’s time by raising redundant issues. Unfairly or unduly are the operative words; all evidence is prejudicial but the question in this instance is it unduly or unfairly prejudicial.

Considerations are often based upon: whether the proffered evidence triggers strong emotional reactions from the jurors such they cannot fairly decide the issue before them, whether the evidence is particularly important to establishing elements of the case, whether there is some alternative way to have the evidence admitted, and finally, whether the jury can be given limiting instructions as to how the evidence may be used by them.

The above is a balancing act, which the judge employs. It is the judge’s determination as to whether the probative value is “substantially outweighed” by unfairness, confusion or undue delay. You will notice that the Federal Rules of the Massachusetts Guide insert the additional consideration of substantial, something that not all codified rules of evidence in other jurisdictions require. Again, it is worth keeping in mind that all evidence is prejudicial and that is not the concern. The concern is whether the admitted evidence will lead to unfairness.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Feinberg & Alban, P.C. fervently protects your rights
  • The Boston firm of Feinberg & Alban, P.C. specializes its practice in the area of personal injury.

    The attorneys serve the entire state of Massachusetts in addition to affiliating with lawyers in other states to handle cases outside of Massachusetts.

  • $7.7 Million Award for Feinberg & Alban Client in Personal Injury Trial

    Boston Attorneys Win Highest Injury Verdict in Massachusetts in 2011 & 2012.

Client Reviews
  • lawyers
    5.0/5.0

    Working with this firm was a great experience, they were very attentive to my case and needs ; the results of my case was better that I expected. Thanks to much to all the lawyers involved Sincerely S. Ponce

    Read more

    Client

  • google
    5.0/5.0

    I loved collaborating with my attorney. From day one it felt like teamwork: us against the world, david vs. goliath. There was an easy rapport, free flow of communication, yet she remained the consummate professional at all times. As a first-time pla...

    Read more

    Oyie Ndzie

  • google
    5.0/5.0

    Excellent Firm! I cannot give enough praise to Colleen Santora who handled our case . Responsive, professional a true attorney who cares. The entire firm put it all together however Colleen brought it all to the table . Five stars does not seem to sa...

    Read more

    ed thomas

  • google
    5.0/5.0

    Atty Santora & staff were very responsive and handled my personal injury case with concern and professional care. I will recommend this firm for legal services.

    Read more

    Regina Benton

  • google
    5.0/5.0

    I had a wonderful experience working with Robert Feinberg and Colleen Santoro. I never once had doubts about how my case would be handled. I knew I was in great hands with both of them. I was always informed and felt confident in their ability to re...

    Read more

    Betsy Rose

See all reviews
Awards & Affiliations
Contact us

Quick Contact Form