Search Site
Menu
Law Through a Lens

Cameras are not used in the federal system. See Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 53, which states, “Except as otherwise provided by a statue or these rules, the court must not permit the taking of photographs in the courtroom during judicial proceedings or the broadcasting of judicial proceedings from the courtroom.”

There has, of course, been a push by the media against the federal ban. Valuable and potentially profitable coverage can be gained from capturing court proceedings on camera. I was fascinated by the nightly video wrap-ups of the O.J. Simpson trial in 1995. Some people, whether fascinated or not, thought the televised aspect resulted in a circus-like atmosphere. One is left to wonder whether or not a nationwide obsession such as the one that was spawned by the Simpson case strengthens the image of justice or weakens it.

There are those besides journalists and media moguls who believe in the broadcasting of legal cases. Texas Congressman Ted Poe states, “…I actually feel the cameras in the courtroom benefit a defendant. A public trial ensures fairness that is the purpose of a public trial. It ensures professionalism by the lawyers and the judge, and a camera in the courtroom projects the defendant’s right to a public trial.” Poe’s sentiments are reflected in the Sunshine in the Courtroom Act, a bill to permit the broadcasting of U.S. District Court and U.S. Court of Appeals proceedings. This bill was approved by the Senate Judiciary Committee in 2009 after being introduced for the first time in 2005. Many, however, remain adamant that a camera has no place in a courtroom, with retired Associate Justice David Souter saying, “The day you see a camera come into our courtroom it’s going to roll over my dead body.”

My opinion is that having a camera in the courtroom is consistent with the openness of the American civil and criminal justice system.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Feinberg & Alban, P.C. fervently protects your rights
  • The Boston firm of Feinberg & Alban, P.C. specializes its practice in the area of personal injury.

    The attorneys serve the entire state of Massachusetts in addition to affiliating with lawyers in other states to handle cases outside of Massachusetts.

  • $7.7 Million Award for Feinberg & Alban Client in Personal Injury Trial

    Boston Attorneys Win Highest Injury Verdict in Massachusetts in 2011 & 2012.

Client Reviews
  • google
    5.0/5.0

    Attorney Santora was very attentive to the details of my case. She was prompt in returning either phone calls or emails. Her expertise aided me in making a decision. It was a pleasure to have her represent me.

    Read more

    Karen Trahan

  • google
    5.0/5.0

    It has been a pleasure working with Feinberg & Alban. I have used then in the past and they have always been both professional and kind in handling my cases and always with a successful outcome. They are a great group of lawyers.

    Read more

    Susan Bender

  • google
    5.0/5.0

    Just wanted to give a review on my experience. My wife was a pedestrian when hit by a car. During that time it was very difficult. Colleen was helpful and understanding with what we were going through. She made the process easy for us to get compens...

    Read more

    David Handley

  • google
    5.0/5.0

    Colleen Santora is the attorney with Feinberg & Alban PC who represented me in my personal injury claim. She was very professional, kind, responsive and communicative throughout the entire process. It was a pleasure to work with her through this pr...

    Read more

    Debbie

  • google
    5.0/5.0

    I recently hired Robert Feinberg of Feinberg and Alban. He was professional, knowledgeable, compassionate, reliable and responsive. The results he brought me were truly amazing. I would highly recommend Robert Feinberg to friends and relatives. I ...

    Read more

    Joanie Bell

See all reviews
Awards & Affiliations
Contact us

Quick Contact Form