Search Site
Menu

Law Through a Lens

Cameras are not used in the federal system. See Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 53, which states, “Except as otherwise provided by a statue or these rules, the court must not permit the taking of photographs in the courtroom during judicial proceedings or the broadcasting of judicial proceedings from the courtroom.”

There has, of course, been a push by the media against the federal ban. Valuable and potentially profitable coverage can be gained from capturing court proceedings on camera. I was fascinated by the nightly video wrap-ups of the O.J. Simpson trial in 1995. Some people, whether fascinated or not, thought the televised aspect resulted in a circus-like atmosphere. One is left to wonder whether or not a nationwide obsession such as the one that was spawned by the Simpson case strengthens the image of justice or weakens it.

There are those besides journalists and media moguls who believe in the broadcasting of legal cases. Texas Congressman Ted Poe states, “…I actually feel the cameras in the courtroom benefit a defendant. A public trial ensures fairness that is the purpose of a public trial. It ensures professionalism by the lawyers and the judge, and a camera in the courtroom projects the defendant’s right to a public trial.” Poe’s sentiments are reflected in the Sunshine in the Courtroom Act, a bill to permit the broadcasting of U.S. District Court and U.S. Court of Appeals proceedings. This bill was approved by the Senate Judiciary Committee in 2009 after being introduced for the first time in 2005. Many, however, remain adamant that a camera has no place in a courtroom, with retired Associate Justice David Souter saying, “The day you see a camera come into our courtroom it’s going to roll over my dead body.”

My opinion is that having a camera in the courtroom is consistent with the openness of the American civil and criminal justice system.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Feinberg & Alban, P.C. fervently protects your rights
  • The Boston firm of Feinberg & Alban, P.C. specializes its practice in the area of personal injury.

    The attorneys serve the entire state of Massachusetts in addition to affiliating with lawyers in other states to handle cases outside of Massachusetts.

  • $7.7 Million Award for Feinberg & Alban Client in Personal Injury Trial

    Boston Attorneys Win Highest Injury Verdict in Massachusetts in 2011 & 2012.

Client Reviews
  • google
    5.0/5.0

    It was a pleasure working with attorney Alexis Cahill. She helped me understand everything and gave me more than I ever thought. She is so nice and an excellent lawyer. I'm glad I went to this co-op.” thank again you for taking care of everyth...

    Read more

    rita botelho

  • google
    5.0/5.0

    Colleen Santora and her partners at Feinberg & Alban went above and beyond in providing efficient and professional representation throughout my recovery process. Colleen is a great attorney that is very knowledgeable and empathetic. She was a pleasur...

    Read more

    ELI-RAN YOUSHAEI

  • google
    5.0/5.0

    Working with this firm was a great experience. Marsha Alban is a great attorney and very easy to work with!

    Read more

    Bronislava Abramova

  • google
    5.0/5.0

    This attorney office is highly efficient, amazing, and professional. They made me feel very comfortable and was invested in my interest. Communication through my whole experience was always professional and prompt. I highly recommend them to anyone w...

    Read more

    Babydoll Babydoll

  • google
    5.0/5.0

    I was in a car accident recently, and was lost in the process of what to do post my injuries. I contacted Feinberg & Alban, where I was introduced to Colleen Santora, who was the best resource I could have ever imagined. Colleen was knowledgable, emp...

    Read more

    OT Tips & Tricks for Kids

See all reviews
Awards & Affiliations
Contact us

Quick Contact Form