Search Site
In accidents on premises, the doctrine as put forth in Oliveri v. MBTA, 363 Mass. 165 (1973) has controlled. It has meant that slip and fall cases involving a foreign substance, whether in a supermarket or otherwise, typically require facts to come within at least one of three categories in order to demonstrate defendant’s lack of reasonable care: 1) defendant created or had actual knowledge of condition, 2) proximity of defendant’s employees to dangerous condition, or 3) evidence of organic matter, such as deterioration, that might indicate amount of time that condition was present. There has been some talk that a more recent case, Sheehan v. Roche Brothers, 448 Mass. 780 (2007) has modified the strictures of Oliveri, although, frankly, I think it is dangerous to overemphasize the scope of the Sheehan doctrine.
Our firm has had significant success with supermarket cases and in other cases involving the liability of a landowner or one in control of premises. It is true that a necessary component for a favorable result involves proving some knowledge (actual or constructive) on the part of the defendant’s employees and a failure to remedy in a satisfactory way the hazardous condition. Usually, however, discovery reveals that there was some actual knowledge on some employee’s part and there was a failure to correct the situation so that no one would be injured. Obviously, there is no guarantee of success but I have been struck by how depositions have yielded the very information that is needed to prove negligence under the criteria set out above.
Feinberg & Alban, P.C. fervently protects your rights
Client Reviews
-
5.0/5.0Wish I could give higher than a 5 for this review. From the start the dedication to detail, care and skill that was applied to my case was outstanding. Robert Feinberg is exceptional at representing his clients. His depth & breadth of experience ma...
-
5.0/5.0
After researching online, hiring Attorney Colleen Santora was the wisest decision I made. She represented me in my personal injury auto accident case. I sustained lingering post-concussive injuries and pain. Throughout a four year process, Colleen...
-
5.0/5.0
Feinberg & Alban did a stellar job representing me at a time when my accident and a busy life didn't leave me any capacity to deal with the logistics of a lawsuit. From across the country, the firm (Ms. Colleen Santora, in particular) handled every a...
-
5.0/5.0
I was in a car accident recently that put me in the hospital and having Perry Feinberg from Feinberg & Alban was the best decision I ever made, with having so many choices for representation in these situations. The level of professionalism was incre...
-
5.0/5.0
I can't say enough about this law firm, and its commitment to its clients. Robert & Colleen took a personal interest in my case, which took several unexpected and frankly wild twists and turns along a very long road. They stuck with it, with me, even...
Awards & Affiliations
Contact us
