Search Site
Menu

Why Is a Doctor's Evaluation Crucial to a Personal Injury Case?

Doctor’s evaluations of people who have suffered accidents are often the single most important factor in obtaining a high settlement or verdict. Without those evaluations, we are only speculating as to someone’s future condition. There is a time and place for lay testimony. However, opinions, conclusions and prognostications (as opposed to descriptions of how someone is feeling) is the province of the medical professional. The appropriate objection to a lay opinion or lay conclusion is that such witness is “not competent” to testify to such matters. We know that the conclusion must come from the doctor but how do we best present that opinion? Furthermore, in the likely event that we need a prognosis, how do we go about getting that opinion?

A board certified doctor is the individual who is the most logical to speak on these matters. A doctor who is not board certified may be competent to testify but would not be the most persuasive witness. The standard to which the doctor renders opinions on causality– the connection of the accident to the injury– diagnosis and prognosis is “to a reasonable degree of medical certainty.” That is the “tagline” of such questions.

An interesting wrinkle in all of this comes in the circumstance where you ask the doctor to give an opinion as to the injured party’s long term prognosis. Again, that prognosis must be “to a reasonable degree of medical certainty.” We are talking about civil cases, so the standard for evidentiary proof is “more probable than not.” It is not to a reasonable doubt. Sometimes, I have seen the civil standard compared to a 51% likelihood. Take the following hypothetical: an individual has been injured in an accident and suffers a fracture of a bone. That individual may develop post-traumatic arthritis. However, the doctor may find that the likelihood of post-traumatic arthritis is in the statistical realm of 40%. That is not more probable than not. Am I therefore precluded from obtaining that testimony? The answer is no, I am not. The proper way to elicit such a conclusion from the medical expert is whether my client is at “an increased risk of developing that condition.”

In the above example, a person’s risk may go from 3% to 40% because of having had that accident. As scientists say, their relative risk is greatly enhanced. In no way should the standard of “more probable than not” preclude such evidence– evidence which is very significant in determining the value of a personal injury case.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Feinberg & Alban, P.C. fervently protects your rights
  • The Boston firm of Feinberg & Alban, P.C. specializes its practice in the area of personal injury.

    The attorneys serve the entire state of Massachusetts in addition to affiliating with lawyers in other states to handle cases outside of Massachusetts.

  • $7.7 Million Award for Feinberg & Alban Client in Personal Injury Trial

    Boston Attorneys Win Highest Injury Verdict in Massachusetts in 2011 & 2012.

Client Reviews
  • google
    5.0/5.0

    Colleen was absolutely amazing to work with! She made the entire process much less stressful and helped me every step of the way. Very happy!

    Read more

    Kendyll Smith

  • google
    5.0/5.0

    Nothing but great things to say. Colleen was amazing, she made the process stress free and always communicated well, and in a timely manor. she was very helpful with any questions I had, and was overall wonderful to work with. I highly recommend.

    Read more

    Ian MacDonnell

  • google
    5.0/5.0

    Nothing but ALL GOOD THINGS! Colleen always got the answers I needed when I needed them, always responded to every text and call, and did it every time with a smile (I always imagined )! When I was getting antsy, she calmed my nerves, and when I made...

    Read more

    Kimberly Sims

  • google
    5.0/5.0

    Colleen is a Wonderful lawyer and communicated with us throughout the whole process and answered emails and phone calls in a timely manner. We highly recommend this law firm and Colleen Santora!

    Read more

    Erica Sacco

  • google
    5.0/5.0

    Perry Feinberg represented me in a personal injury case. He was always accessible and very clear in his communications. I was very upset when the process commenced because thinking about the accident upset me greatly, but Perry was extremely patient ...

    Read more

    Lisa Tagio

See all reviews
Awards & Affiliations
Contact us

Quick Contact Form