Search Site
Menu

What Lessons Can Be Learned From the Fyffe Decision? Part 1 of 4

In our video blog we discuss the very recent recent decision by the Massachusetts Appeals Court in Fyffe v. Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority, 86 Mass. App. Ct. 457 (2014), a case that seems to be viewed by many plaintiffs attorneys as unsettling. I, on the other hand, find that the case merely sets out what must be established to prove a case. To be sure, it also sets out what must not be done.

The Massachusetts Appeals Court set aside a large verdict for Fyffe due to the fact that in their view the plaintiff’s counsel had committed many egregious errors of professional judgment. In support of their findings, the Appeals Court outlined three mistakes that were made by plaintiff’s counsel: 1) the plaintiff arguing facts that were not in evidence, 2) discussing issues of liability despite the parties’ stipulation, and 3) the plaintiff’s attorney arguing that the jury was the conscience of the community and had a duty in this case to safeguard the users of public transportation in the future.

In terms of the first point by the Appeals Court, the plaintiff’s attorney attempted to put into evidence the risk of the plaintiff developing quadriplegia in the future even though the parties had not discussed this before trial in the pre-trial conference. Such a “curveball” is not allowed and was clear error by the attorney, who even agreed that the issue of quadriplegia would not be presented to the jury.

As to the second point, a stipulation was made between the plaintiff and defendant that liability was not in issue. Consequently, the trial court judge sustained many objections raised by the defendant’s attorney when the plaintiff attempted to present evidence regarding safety violations committed by the MBTA. That was viewed as “gilding the lilly”, my words to suggest that the plaintiff’s counsel was trying to show gross negligence where there was a stipulation of negligence.

The third factor was due to the introduction of extraneous considerations by the plaintiff’s counsel. Such comments involved the focus on media coverage, arguments on jurors serving as the conscience of the community and the statement by the plaintiff’s lawyer that each juror would have to justify his/her position to the other jurors. The court took offense to that. No doubt, the lawyer would have been better off suggesting to the jury that their collective wisdom is deemed to be the standard for what the community expects.

In summation, I am not concerned with the decision in Fyffe. I believe that the Appeals Court has added no new constraints to what an attorney for the injured can argue.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Feinberg & Alban, P.C. fervently protects your rights
  • The Boston firm of Feinberg & Alban, P.C. specializes its practice in the area of personal injury.

    The attorneys serve the entire state of Massachusetts in addition to affiliating with lawyers in other states to handle cases outside of Massachusetts.

  • $7.7 Million Award for Feinberg & Alban Client in Personal Injury Trial

    Boston Attorneys Win Highest Injury Verdict in Massachusetts in 2011 & 2012.

Client Reviews
  • lawyers
    5.0/5.0

    Alexis Cahill represented me on a personal injury case. I was hurt in A car accident and I could not be happier with the outcome Alexis was able to achieve for me. She was conscientious, answered all my questions In a timely manner, and was very eas...

    Read more

    Client

  • google
    5.0/5.0

    I reached out to Feinberg & Alban thru their website. Robert Feinberg called me back the same day. He made me feel important and very comfortable. Colleen Santora was the attorney on my case and she was fantastic! She kept me well informed through ou...

    Read more

    Vern Quashie

  • google
    5.0/5.0

    Attorney Colleen Santora, was a pleasure to work with throughout my personal injury case. She makes the process seamless for her clients and is there to answer any questions you have. She negotiated every aspect of my case and got me the settlement I...

    Read more

    Cody

  • google
    5.0/5.0

    We were very pleased with all aspects of this law firm! My husband was struck by a truck while crossing the street. We hired attorney Colleen Santora of Feinberg & Alban PC. Colleen immediately showed empathy towards my husbands condition, aside fro...

    Read more

    Cleopatra Anderson

  • google
    5.0/5.0

    Attorney Colleen Santora assisted me after a terrifying highway incident. She came to my home because I was not able to travel, and she remained compassionate, professional, and highly competent throughout my case. I would highly recommend retaining...

    Read more

    Susan Hawes

See all reviews
Awards & Affiliations
Contact us

Quick Contact Form