Search Site
Menu

What Lessons Can Be Learned From the Fyffe Decision? Part 4 of 4

This will be the concluding blog in the series of discussions about the recent Massachusetts Appeals Court decision, Fyffe v. MBTA. There are a few more points worth considering.

First, I have discussed the concept of speculation by a medical expert or an attorney in past blogs and the Appeals Court in Fyffe discusses the subject at some length. Specifically, the Court rejected the plaintiff’s attorney attempt to bring up the issue of quadriplegia because there was no record of evidence to support such speculation. There had been no suggestion of this issue in the pretrial documents. At one point in the trial, the plaintiff’s counsel even conceded that quadriplegia would not be an issue.

In the last blog I discussed how the loss of earning capacity is calculated. I mentioned that a medical expert can determine the future loss of earning capacity and then that amount can be reduced to present value. However, an economist or other expert will not be required to testify or present evidence to verify this amount. The judge will instruct the jury accordingly.

The last concept that I will discuss with regard to the Fyffe decision is the idea of a “remittitur.” A remittitur is where the court finds that the amount awarded by the jury was too much and must be reduced. In this case, however, the Court found that the amount awarded by the jury was in the acceptable range of amounts that could have been awarded to the plaintiff for the damages sustained. Nevertheless, the “numerous and repeated violations of the law by plaintiff’s trial counsel” led to the need to order a new trial. Certainly, the cumulative effect weighed heavily on the Appeals Court.

Cases like Fyffe can be unsettling. This is because their reach becomes too vast. I argue that a proper reading of Fyffe is that it just calls for trial practice as it has always been taught. In that sense, it blazes no new ground. I intend to argue with defense counsel strenuously that my presentation will not run afoul of any of the rulings in Fyffe and therefore my clients should not be penalized by this decision. It is often said that “bad cases make for bad law.” Here, the law is not bad and it simply offers a lesson in what to avoid.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Feinberg & Alban, P.C. fervently protects your rights
  • The Boston firm of Feinberg & Alban, P.C. specializes its practice in the area of personal injury.

    The attorneys serve the entire state of Massachusetts in addition to affiliating with lawyers in other states to handle cases outside of Massachusetts.

  • $7.7 Million Award for Feinberg & Alban Client in Personal Injury Trial

    Boston Attorneys Win Highest Injury Verdict in Massachusetts in 2011 & 2012.

Client Reviews
  • google
    5.0/5.0

    Wish I could give higher than a 5 for this review. From the start the dedication to detail, care and skill that was applied to my case was outstanding. Robert Feinberg is exceptional at representing his clients. His depth & breadth of experience ma...

    Read more

    Rose M

  • google
    5.0/5.0

    After researching online, hiring Attorney Colleen Santora was the wisest decision I made. She represented me in my personal injury auto accident case. I sustained lingering post-concussive injuries and pain. Throughout a four year process, Colleen...

    Read more

    Diane DeMarco

  • google
    5.0/5.0

    Feinberg & Alban did a stellar job representing me at a time when my accident and a busy life didn't leave me any capacity to deal with the logistics of a lawsuit. From across the country, the firm (Ms. Colleen Santora, in particular) handled every a...

    Read more

    Trevor Zierhut

  • google
    5.0/5.0

    I was in a car accident recently that put me in the hospital and having Perry Feinberg from Feinberg & Alban was the best decision I ever made, with having so many choices for representation in these situations. The level of professionalism was incre...

    Read more

    John Stenis

  • google
    5.0/5.0

    I can't say enough about this law firm, and its commitment to its clients. Robert & Colleen took a personal interest in my case, which took several unexpected and frankly wild twists and turns along a very long road. They stuck with it, with me, even...

    Read more

    Wu tang Is for the children

See all reviews
Awards & Affiliations
Contact us

Quick Contact Form