Search Site
Menu
Is a Premises Liability Case Affected By the Open and Obvious Rule?

A premises liability case is one in which a person sustains an injury while on somebody else’s property, whether it be a landlord, business or other entity. These cases almost always involve an issue of management or control over the premises. The question is whether the landlord or other person in control exercised reasonable care in maintaining the area.

In Massachusetts, I will often hear an insurance company argue that my client failed to take into account the open and obvious nature of the condition that caused the accident. In the Supreme Judicial Court’s decision of O’Sullivan v. Shaw, 431 Mass. 201 (2000), a plaintiff who jumped into a shallow area of a pool suffered substantial injuries. In that case, the court found that the open and obvious rule stopped the plaintiff from bringing a successful suit. The injured man could not expect a warning. This is a logical decision. Several commentators, including the Boston Globe, editorialized in favor of the Court’s decision.

The O’Sullivan case is a rather extreme example of the rule since a person should know the dangers of jumping headfirst into a pool when that person is not sure of its depth or knows it is shallow. Most cases are not so clear-cut. In fact, O’Sullivan was ruled inapplicable in another pool accident. In that case, the deck had insufficient lighting and no guardrails and led to the person’s fall. A warning was therefore irrelevant. Our courts are willing to find that there can be responsibility if property is maintained in a dangerous condition. The landlord, or other person in control, cannot claim that the dangerous condition was open and obvious.

In conclusion, the open and obvious rule will not be a proper defense to liability in most situations. It is overused by the other side. We are controlled by common sense but not controlled by an individual’s unwillingness to remedy an unsafe situation, no matter how open and obvious.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Feinberg & Alban, P.C. fervently protects your rights
  • The Boston firm of Feinberg & Alban, P.C. specializes its practice in the area of personal injury.

    The attorneys serve the entire state of Massachusetts in addition to affiliating with lawyers in other states to handle cases outside of Massachusetts.

  • $7.7 Million Award for Feinberg & Alban Client in Personal Injury Trial

    Boston Attorneys Win Highest Injury Verdict in Massachusetts in 2011 & 2012.

Client Reviews
  • lawyers
    5.0/5.0

    Working with this firm was a great experience, they were very attentive to my case and needs ; the results of my case was better that I expected. Thanks to much to all the lawyers involved Sincerely S. Ponce

    Read more

    Client

  • google
    5.0/5.0

    I loved collaborating with my attorney. From day one it felt like teamwork: us against the world, david vs. goliath. There was an easy rapport, free flow of communication, yet she remained the consummate professional at all times. As a first-time pla...

    Read more

    Oyie Ndzie

  • google
    5.0/5.0

    Excellent Firm! I cannot give enough praise to Colleen Santora who handled our case . Responsive, professional a true attorney who cares. The entire firm put it all together however Colleen brought it all to the table . Five stars does not seem to sa...

    Read more

    ed thomas

  • google
    5.0/5.0

    Atty Santora & staff were very responsive and handled my personal injury case with concern and professional care. I will recommend this firm for legal services.

    Read more

    Regina Benton

  • google
    5.0/5.0

    I had a wonderful experience working with Robert Feinberg and Colleen Santoro. I never once had doubts about how my case would be handled. I knew I was in great hands with both of them. I was always informed and felt confident in their ability to re...

    Read more

    Betsy Rose

See all reviews
Awards & Affiliations
Contact us

Quick Contact Form