Search Site
Menu
Is a Premises Liability Case Affected By the Open and Obvious Rule?

A premises liability case is one in which a person sustains an injury while on somebody else’s property, whether it be a landlord, business or other entity. These cases almost always involve an issue of management or control over the premises. The question is whether the landlord or other person in control exercised reasonable care in maintaining the area.

In Massachusetts, I will often hear an insurance company argue that my client failed to take into account the open and obvious nature of the condition that caused the accident. In the Supreme Judicial Court’s decision of O’Sullivan v. Shaw, 431 Mass. 201 (2000), a plaintiff who jumped into a shallow area of a pool suffered substantial injuries. In that case, the court found that the open and obvious rule stopped the plaintiff from bringing a successful suit. The injured man could not expect a warning. This is a logical decision. Several commentators, including the Boston Globe, editorialized in favor of the Court’s decision.

The O’Sullivan case is a rather extreme example of the rule since a person should know the dangers of jumping headfirst into a pool when that person is not sure of its depth or knows it is shallow. Most cases are not so clear-cut. In fact, O’Sullivan was ruled inapplicable in another pool accident. In that case, the deck had insufficient lighting and no guardrails and led to the person’s fall. A warning was therefore irrelevant. Our courts are willing to find that there can be responsibility if property is maintained in a dangerous condition. The landlord, or other person in control, cannot claim that the dangerous condition was open and obvious.

In conclusion, the open and obvious rule will not be a proper defense to liability in most situations. It is overused by the other side. We are controlled by common sense but not controlled by an individual’s unwillingness to remedy an unsafe situation, no matter how open and obvious.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Feinberg & Alban, P.C. fervently protects your rights
  • The Boston firm of Feinberg & Alban, P.C. specializes its practice in the area of personal injury.

    The attorneys serve the entire state of Massachusetts in addition to affiliating with lawyers in other states to handle cases outside of Massachusetts.

  • $7.7 Million Award for Feinberg & Alban Client in Personal Injury Trial

    Boston Attorneys Win Highest Injury Verdict in Massachusetts in 2011 & 2012.

Client Reviews
  • lawyers
    5.0/5.0

    Большое спасибо сотрудникам компании Feinberg & Alban и особенно Marsha Alban за высокий профессионализм и внимательное отношение к клиентам. Благ...

    Read more

    Client

  • google
    5.0/5.0

    We would recommend Atty. Colleen Santora and the entire team at Feinberg & Alban highly. We had a major auto accident in 2012 and my husband also at a bad motorcycle accident as well four years after. We have always relied on her, She is a class act ...

    Read more

    Kyle Meahl

  • google
    5.0/5.0

    Attorney Feinberg is an excellent attorney with top level trial skills. He has given invaluable insight and knowledge on cases at trial that only an attorney of his caliber and experience could provide. I would highly recommend him and his staff.

    Read more

    Jeremy Carroll

  • google
    5.0/5.0

    I highly recommend this law firm to anybody in need of a excellent Attorney. Colleen is very responsive as well as friendly and caring!! I had a great experience working with her an as i mentioned above i would recommend her office.

    Read more

    Keri Pait

  • google
    5.0/5.0

    Marsha was experienced, very helpful and thorough. Absolutely wonderful to work with! I would highly recommend her and this firm to anyone!

    Read more

    Tedrina R

See all reviews
Awards & Affiliations
Contact us

Quick Contact Form