Search Site
Menu
Is a Premises Liability Case Affected By the Open and Obvious Rule?

A premises liability case is one in which a person sustains an injury while on somebody else’s property, whether it be a landlord, business or other entity. These cases almost always involve an issue of management or control over the premises. The question is whether the landlord or other person in control exercised reasonable care in maintaining the area.

In Massachusetts, I will often hear an insurance company argue that my client failed to take into account the open and obvious nature of the condition that caused the accident. In the Supreme Judicial Court’s decision of O’Sullivan v. Shaw, 431 Mass. 201 (2000), a plaintiff who jumped into a shallow area of a pool suffered substantial injuries. In that case, the court found that the open and obvious rule stopped the plaintiff from bringing a successful suit. The injured man could not expect a warning. This is a logical decision. Several commentators, including the Boston Globe, editorialized in favor of the Court’s decision.

The O’Sullivan case is a rather extreme example of the rule since a person should know the dangers of jumping headfirst into a pool when that person is not sure of its depth or knows it is shallow. Most cases are not so clear-cut. In fact, O’Sullivan was ruled inapplicable in another pool accident. In that case, the deck had insufficient lighting and no guardrails and led to the person’s fall. A warning was therefore irrelevant. Our courts are willing to find that there can be responsibility if property is maintained in a dangerous condition. The landlord, or other person in control, cannot claim that the dangerous condition was open and obvious.

In conclusion, the open and obvious rule will not be a proper defense to liability in most situations. It is overused by the other side. We are controlled by common sense but not controlled by an individual’s unwillingness to remedy an unsafe situation, no matter how open and obvious.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Feinberg & Alban, P.C. fervently protects your rights
  • The Boston firm of Feinberg & Alban, P.C. specializes its practice in the area of personal injury.

    The attorneys serve the entire state of Massachusetts in addition to affiliating with lawyers in other states to handle cases outside of Massachusetts.

  • $7.7 Million Award for Feinberg & Alban Client in Personal Injury Trial

    Boston Attorneys Win Highest Injury Verdict in Massachusetts in 2011 & 2012.

Client Reviews
  • google
    5.0/5.0

    I got chance make car accident (it's not my fault). Before I didn't have any accident like that one. I choose this agency accidentally due to it's location was convenient to my job. I was surprise (good surprise) that agency lawyer (Colleen Santora)...

    Read more

    Anatoly Gorbatchev

  • google
    5.0/5.0

    Colleen Santora was a great attorney to have during my motor accident. She is very responsive and great at her job. She supported me mentally and professionally. I recommend her to everyone who wants real results.

    Read more

    Nnamdi Chinemere

  • google
    5.0/5.0

    Marsha Alban is a great attorney and very easy to work with!

    Read more

    Lana Bautin

  • google
    5.0/5.0

    I have had the pleasure of working with Attorney Santora several times, and she has never let me down. She is professional, compassionate, knowledgeable, and always keeps my best interest at the forefront. I have recommended her to friends without he...

    Read more

    Brian Orsatti

  • google
    5.0/5.0

    I highly recommend Marsha! From start to finish was just as easy as a law process can be. No words to explain how wonderful all of them are. Highly proportional and caring. All questions answered , all problems resolved. Thank you ! Look no more. Thi...

    Read more

    Katerina Zhantuan

See all reviews
Awards & Affiliations
Contact us

Quick Contact Form