Search Site
Menu
Which Insurance Companies Do I Look to For My Car Accident?

In 1985, the Supreme Judicial Court decided Cardin v. Royal Insurance Co., 394 Mass. 350 (1985), an important case pertaining to auto insurance. In that case, the Court used a sentence that has stuck with me ever since reading the opinion: “Navigating the tortuous twists of automobile insurance law is at least as difficult as the uninitiated driver’s first foray into the streets of Boston.” This is an accurate statement because understanding and appreciating all of the nuances of automobile insurance law in Massachusetts is a very difficult task.

In a seemingly straightforward car accident scenario, many different automobile insurers can be implicated. For example, if a client is a passenger in a friend’s car and that car is struck by another vehicle, there can be three or four different insurance companies and policies involved.

The vehicle which the client was occupying will provide Personal Injury Protection benefits– P.I.P. benefits. These benefits will pay three quarters of the client’s lost wages and pay for the first $2,000 in medical treatment. After the $2,000 is exhausted, under our coordination of benefits law, auto insurance will pay only for medical bills that are not covered by health insurance. The limit for P.I.P. benefits is $8,000. Hopefully, the client has access to medical payments under Part 6 and those could be available from either the car in which the client is riding or from the client’s household vehicles or even both. Medical payments can be stacked unlike uninsurance or underinsurance, which was prohibited in the landmark legislation of 1988. See M.G.L. c. 175, 113L.

Assume in this two car accident, that the other car was stolen. This recently happened to my client, a passenger in the first car. The stolen vehicle is deemed to be uninsured. (Of course, an attorney would still attempt to notify the insurance company that covered that vehicle to ascertain that there is no coverage.) If there is a denial of coverage, then the attorney would look to cars in the client’s household to cover the client’s pain and suffering. This is bodily injury caused by an uninsured vehicle under Part 3. Many years ago, the car in which the person was riding would provide that coverage (in addition to household vehicles) but now you must necessarily look to cars in the client’s household for that coverage. Such cars are not even involved in the accident when a client is riding in a friend’s car. Nevertheless, since 1989, the first resort is to household vehicles for Part 3 (and Part 12) coverage. If none exists, then and only then, can the client get such coverage from the car in which the client is riding. There is no effect when seeking Part 3 (or Part 12 coverage) on one’s auto insurance premium so, happily, that need not be a concern.

What about if the car in which the client is riding contributed to the accident? Then the client will not only seek PIP benefits from that car but will also make a claim under Part 5, optional bodily injury to others, the coverage for guest occupants. As the above hypothetical suggests, potentially four automobile insurers could be involved: 1) the insurer for the car in which the client was riding (PIP and possibly optional bodily injury); 2) an insurer on the other vehicle in the two car collision, which vehicle in this fact situation may be deemed uninsured for various reasons; and 3 and 4) the insurers of the client’s own household vehicles to contribute on a pro rata basis for Part 3 coverage and, if available, for Part 6 coverage. As you can see, a straightforward accident has become a maze consisting of numerous insurance companies.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Feinberg & Alban, P.C. fervently protects your rights
  • The Boston firm of Feinberg & Alban, P.C. specializes its practice in the area of personal injury.

    The attorneys serve the entire state of Massachusetts in addition to affiliating with lawyers in other states to handle cases outside of Massachusetts.

  • $7.7 Million Award for Feinberg & Alban Client in Personal Injury Trial

    Boston Attorneys Win Highest Injury Verdict in Massachusetts in 2011 & 2012.

Client Reviews
  • lawyers
    5.0/5.0

    Working with this firm was a great experience, they were very attentive to my case and needs ; the results of my case was better that I expected. Thanks to much to all the lawyers involved Sincerely S. Ponce

    Read more

    Client

  • google
    5.0/5.0

    I loved collaborating with my attorney. From day one it felt like teamwork: us against the world, david vs. goliath. There was an easy rapport, free flow of communication, yet she remained the consummate professional at all times. As a first-time pla...

    Read more

    Oyie Ndzie

  • google
    5.0/5.0

    Excellent Firm! I cannot give enough praise to Colleen Santora who handled our case . Responsive, professional a true attorney who cares. The entire firm put it all together however Colleen brought it all to the table . Five stars does not seem to sa...

    Read more

    ed thomas

  • google
    5.0/5.0

    Atty Santora & staff were very responsive and handled my personal injury case with concern and professional care. I will recommend this firm for legal services.

    Read more

    Regina Benton

  • google
    5.0/5.0

    I had a wonderful experience working with Robert Feinberg and Colleen Santoro. I never once had doubts about how my case would be handled. I knew I was in great hands with both of them. I was always informed and felt confident in their ability to re...

    Read more

    Betsy Rose

See all reviews
Awards & Affiliations
Contact us

Quick Contact Form