Search Site
Menu
Which Insurance Companies Do I Look to For My Car Accident?

In 1985, the Supreme Judicial Court decided Cardin v. Royal Insurance Co., 394 Mass. 350 (1985), an important case pertaining to auto insurance. In that case, the Court used a sentence that has stuck with me ever since reading the opinion: “Navigating the tortuous twists of automobile insurance law is at least as difficult as the uninitiated driver’s first foray into the streets of Boston.” This is an accurate statement because understanding and appreciating all of the nuances of automobile insurance law in Massachusetts is a very difficult task.

In a seemingly straightforward car accident scenario, many different automobile insurers can be implicated. For example, if a client is a passenger in a friend’s car and that car is struck by another vehicle, there can be three or four different insurance companies and policies involved.

The vehicle which the client was occupying will provide Personal Injury Protection benefits– P.I.P. benefits. These benefits will pay three quarters of the client’s lost wages and pay for the first $2,000 in medical treatment. After the $2,000 is exhausted, under our coordination of benefits law, auto insurance will pay only for medical bills that are not covered by health insurance. The limit for P.I.P. benefits is $8,000. Hopefully, the client has access to medical payments under Part 6 and those could be available from either the car in which the client is riding or from the client’s household vehicles or even both. Medical payments can be stacked unlike uninsurance or underinsurance, which was prohibited in the landmark legislation of 1988. See M.G.L. c. 175, 113L.

Assume in this two car accident, that the other car was stolen. This recently happened to my client, a passenger in the first car. The stolen vehicle is deemed to be uninsured. (Of course, an attorney would still attempt to notify the insurance company that covered that vehicle to ascertain that there is no coverage.) If there is a denial of coverage, then the attorney would look to cars in the client’s household to cover the client’s pain and suffering. This is bodily injury caused by an uninsured vehicle under Part 3. Many years ago, the car in which the person was riding would provide that coverage (in addition to household vehicles) but now you must necessarily look to cars in the client’s household for that coverage. Such cars are not even involved in the accident when a client is riding in a friend’s car. Nevertheless, since 1989, the first resort is to household vehicles for Part 3 (and Part 12) coverage. If none exists, then and only then, can the client get such coverage from the car in which the client is riding. There is no effect when seeking Part 3 (or Part 12 coverage) on one’s auto insurance premium so, happily, that need not be a concern.

What about if the car in which the client is riding contributed to the accident? Then the client will not only seek PIP benefits from that car but will also make a claim under Part 5, optional bodily injury to others, the coverage for guest occupants. As the above hypothetical suggests, potentially four automobile insurers could be involved: 1) the insurer for the car in which the client was riding (PIP and possibly optional bodily injury); 2) an insurer on the other vehicle in the two car collision, which vehicle in this fact situation may be deemed uninsured for various reasons; and 3 and 4) the insurers of the client’s own household vehicles to contribute on a pro rata basis for Part 3 coverage and, if available, for Part 6 coverage. As you can see, a straightforward accident has become a maze consisting of numerous insurance companies.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Feinberg & Alban, P.C. fervently protects your rights
  • The Boston firm of Feinberg & Alban, P.C. specializes its practice in the area of personal injury.

    The attorneys serve the entire state of Massachusetts in addition to affiliating with lawyers in other states to handle cases outside of Massachusetts.

  • $7.7 Million Award for Feinberg & Alban Client in Personal Injury Trial

    Boston Attorneys Win Highest Injury Verdict in Massachusetts in 2011 & 2012.

Client Reviews
  • google
    5.0/5.0

    Marsha Alban is a great attorney and very easy to work with!

    Read more

    Lana Bautin

  • google
    5.0/5.0

    I have had the pleasure of working with Attorney Santora several times, and she has never let me down. She is professional, compassionate, knowledgeable, and always keeps my best interest at the forefront. I have recommended her to friends without he...

    Read more

    Brian Orsatti

  • google
    5.0/5.0

    I highly recommend Marsha! From start to finish was just as easy as a law process can be. No words to explain how wonderful all of them are. Highly proportional and caring. All questions answered , all problems resolved. Thank you ! Look no more. Thi...

    Read more

    Katerina Zhantuan

  • lawyers
    5.0/5.0

    Marsha and Paula were nice to work with. Both of these women were top notched. I enjoyed being updated on my case without the usual hassles of emailing and continuously leaving voice mails. Working with these two women were stress free and that was v...

    Read more

    Client

  • google
    5.0/5.0

    Attorney Santora was very attentive to the details of my case. She was prompt in returning either phone calls or emails. Her expertise aided me in making a decision. It was a pleasure to have her represent me.

    Read more

    Karen Trahan

See all reviews
Awards & Affiliations
Contact us

Quick Contact Form