Search Site
Menu
The Dangers of Speculation By a Medical Provider in a Personal Injury Case

I often have clients who report to me that their medical provider will corroborate the crucial fact that the injury was caused by the accident. A review of the records, however, may reveal that there is a “possible” relationship between the accident and the injury. Sometimes, the term “could be related” is used. Thus, the causal connection is unclear at best.

Words like “possible” and “could be” are not opinions that pass legal muster for acceptable conclusions. In fact, they pose a fatal problem. The courts will often refer to them as speculative. Doctors must conclude to “a reasonable degree of medical certainty”. In the same vein, an engineer must conclude to a reasonable degree of engineering certainty. This is expected by Massachusetts courts whether the question is explicitly asked or not. The minimum requirement for a conclusion is proof by a preponderance of the evidence. An acceptable question would therefore be: “Doctor, do you have an opinion to a reasonable degree of medical certainty whether the injury is more probably than not related to the accident?” Tactically, your lawyer may want to phrase that question in a different way. The prior question is meant to give you an idea of what the doctor must think at a minimum for his/her conclusion to be used in a personal injury case.

Experienced practitioners will tell you that there is no substitute for clarity. That is why you will see questions with a simple inquiry: “Doctor, do you have an opinion as to whether the accident caused [the client’s] condition?” Implied in that question are all the elements listed in the preceding paragraph. A follow up question can be if the conclusion or opinion is to a reasonable degree of medical certainty. If the answer[s] is in the affirmative, the foundation has been laid for success.

Causality is crucial and speculation is to be avoided at all costs. For a full and fair resolution of the case, a question should follow as to what the future holds for the client. That too requires an opinion to a reasonable degree of medical certainty. If appropriate, an attorney can also ask about the client’s level of impairment according to acceptable guidelines, such as the American Medical Association’s impairment rating. Additionally, there should be case-specific questions beyond the standard questions regarding causality, prognosis and impairment.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Feinberg & Alban, P.C. fervently protects your rights
  • The Boston firm of Feinberg & Alban, P.C. specializes its practice in the area of personal injury.

    The attorneys serve the entire state of Massachusetts in addition to affiliating with lawyers in other states to handle cases outside of Massachusetts.

  • $7.7 Million Award for Feinberg & Alban Client in Personal Injury Trial

    Boston Attorneys Win Highest Injury Verdict in Massachusetts in 2011 & 2012.

Client Reviews
  • lawyers
    5.0/5.0

    Working with this firm was a great experience, they were very attentive to my case and needs ; the results of my case was better that I expected. Thanks to much to all the lawyers involved Sincerely S. Ponce

    Read more

    Client

  • google
    5.0/5.0

    I loved collaborating with my attorney. From day one it felt like teamwork: us against the world, david vs. goliath. There was an easy rapport, free flow of communication, yet she remained the consummate professional at all times. As a first-time pla...

    Read more

    Oyie Ndzie

  • google
    5.0/5.0

    Excellent Firm! I cannot give enough praise to Colleen Santora who handled our case . Responsive, professional a true attorney who cares. The entire firm put it all together however Colleen brought it all to the table . Five stars does not seem to sa...

    Read more

    ed thomas

  • google
    5.0/5.0

    Atty Santora & staff were very responsive and handled my personal injury case with concern and professional care. I will recommend this firm for legal services.

    Read more

    Regina Benton

  • google
    5.0/5.0

    I had a wonderful experience working with Robert Feinberg and Colleen Santoro. I never once had doubts about how my case would be handled. I knew I was in great hands with both of them. I was always informed and felt confident in their ability to re...

    Read more

    Betsy Rose

See all reviews
Awards & Affiliations
Contact us

Quick Contact Form