Search Site
Menu

What Do We Look For After an Accident?

In a recent video blog, Defense attorney John Johnson spoke of important factors that he uses to assess a case. He explicitly mentioned that statements made soon after an accident or to a medical provider are very relevant to his determination of liability. As a plaintiff’s attorney, I want to point out that this can go either way: statements of the defendant at an accident scene are also very probative and for the same reasons.

Why are these statements given such emphasis? As this video blog discusses, statements that are closest in time to an accident– such as those to a first responder or to a medical provider– are excepted from the hearsay rule. They are made by a party to the action and therefore can be introduced by the adversary as an admission of a party opponent. (Note that you cannot introduce statements of your own client unless within another exception to the hearsay rule. This concept has sometimes eluded even experienced litigators, to my surprise.) Their exception derives, in part, from the notion that such statements have reliability– the term we often hear is “indicia of reliability”. Statements made before one has an opportunity to reflect are deemed honest perceptions. The person has not had time to consider the legal implications and, in the modern vernacular, has not been “lawyered up”. Consequently, there won’t be a nuanced or parsed description. An additional benefit of such statements is that the speaker’s memory is sharp. In contrast, depositions and certainly trials, are often years later. At that time, memories aren’t so fresh. Such statements are not only exceptions to the hearsay rule but they also have persuasive value to the people who assess these cases.

With respect to statements in hospital records, there is a caveat that deserves mentioning. For that, please review M.G.L. c. 233, s. 79 and the case of Bouchie v. Murray, 376 Mass. 524 (1978). The operative language is that “nothing therein contained [referencing medical records] shall be admissible as evidence which has reference to the question of liability.” Without getting into an overly detailed analysis of hearsay, if the statement is made by the party and reflects on liability, rest assured it will have a significant effect on settlement value, the language of the statute notwithstanding. As a cautionary note, however, it is important to learn whether the statement is actually from the party as opposed to containing multiple levels of hearsay.

I cannot emphasize enough how important these statements are. Believe me, it is much better to be able to use a statement of the adverse party that reflects poorly on that party than to be confronted with your own client’s adverse statement. Such remarks go a long way toward determining the outcome of a case.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Feinberg & Alban, P.C. fervently protects your rights
  • The Boston firm of Feinberg & Alban, P.C. specializes its practice in the area of personal injury.

    The attorneys serve the entire state of Massachusetts in addition to affiliating with lawyers in other states to handle cases outside of Massachusetts.

  • $7.7 Million Award for Feinberg & Alban Client in Personal Injury Trial

    Boston Attorneys Win Highest Injury Verdict in Massachusetts in 2011 & 2012.

Client Reviews
  • google
    5.0/5.0

    Great communication and quick responses from Colleen. It was a pleasure to work with her.

    Read more

    Cecelia DiSabato

  • google
    5.0/5.0

    I was very pleased with my experience with Feinberg & Alban and the result with my case. Perry Feinberg was great and he helped relieve the stress of having to figure out the next steps with my car accident case. He was professional and very knowle...

    Read more

    Tadashia Rice

  • google
    5.0/5.0

    Awesome people would highly recommend A++++++ in my book

    Read more

    sam adams

  • google
    5.0/5.0

    I had such a great experience with this law firm. Mrs. Colleen was my lawyer. She and her team were so cooperative and worked fast on my case. They made the processe so smooth. I would definitely choose them again for any accident case I have.

    Read more

    Anghine Picault

  • google
    5.0/5.0

    Having to hire a lawyer for a traumatic accident is stressful and uncertain, you are putting your faith and trust in to someone you don't know. Our experience with Robert was great. When you're going through a scary and stressful time it's comforting...

    Read more

    Dawn Sullivan

See all reviews
Awards & Affiliations
Contact us

Quick Contact Form