Search Site
Menu

Is an Employer Liable for the Act of an Employee Which Causes an Accident?

Is an Employer Liable for the Act of an Employee Which Causes an Accident?

If you are driving along the road and another auto that is driven by an employee of a company causes an accident, what is your recourse?

In the above scenario, you will want to know a few things immediately:

  • Was the individual who caused the accident working at the time of the accident?
  • Was the individual in the scope of his/her employment at the time of the accident?
  • What is the insurance coverage on the vehicle?
  • Are there other insurance policies that cover the employer?

Although a case can be brought against the driver/employee, the injured party’s lawyer wants to know about the employment relationship of the at-fault party and the amount of insurance coverage. I can state with reasonable certainty that in these situations you are almost always dealing with a large policy written to the employer. It is very rare that you will have to proceed against the employee only. These situations almost always result in a claim against the employer (and thus typically a larger insurance policy), as the employee is almost always in the course and scope of his/her employment.

Given what we usually see, the most compensable third party claims are those where “vicarious liability” plays a factor in the recovery. In the realm of modern litigation, vicarious liability, also referred to as respondeat superior, typically occurs where an employee has made a mistake which has caused the plaintiff’s injury and the plaintiff is seeking to hold accountable the company or business that is employing this particular employee.

The plaintiff will need to show that the employee was acting within the “scope of his employment” when the wrongdoing that led to the plaintiff’s injury occurred. Basically, this means that plaintiff must show that the employee was actually working when his or her negligent conduct caused the plaintiff’s injury. The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court has focused on three ideas when assessing whether an employee’s conduct falls within the scope of his or her employment: 1) when the behavior of the employee is consistent with the work for which he/she was hired, 2) the negligence of the employee takes place during the hours of employment, and 3) that the negligence actions of the employee were motivated, at least in part, by a desire to serve the employer. See Lev v. Beverly enterprises-Massachusetts, Inc., 457 Mass. 234, 238 (2010).

The above criteria may seem difficult to prove. However, proving them is seldom difficult. In more than thirty years of practice, I have seen very few cases where the employer denies the employer-employee relationship at the time of the accident. Therefore, we almost always proceed against the employer and proceed against a large insurance policy.

In those few instances where the employment relationship is contested, how do courts determine when if the vicarious liability doctrine is appropriate to the facts? In Massachusetts, generally the courts have focused on the concept of control, specifically the amount of control that an employer has over the actions of an employee, as one part of the test for determining vicarious liability. Control– also frequently discussed as a “special relationship” between the employer and employee– is the concept that an employer will be liable for an employee’s acts when the employer’s control over the employment facilitates the harm done to a third party. This concept of control can have many different applications, such as the fact that the employer controlled the amount of time that the employee worked when the accident occurred; or that the employer controlled the location where the employee was working when the accident occurred; or, the most likely scenario, that the employer exercised control by giving the employee a mission or objective that the employee was attempting to complete when the accident occurred. See Silvia v. Woodhouse, 356 Mass. 119, 124 (1969).

Bottom Line

When the tortfeasor, the negligent party, is acting as an employee, I know that I have an action against the employer and not just, if at all, against the employee.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Feinberg & Alban, P.C. fervently protects your rights
  • The Boston firm of Feinberg & Alban, P.C. specializes its practice in the area of personal injury.

    The attorneys serve the entire state of Massachusetts in addition to affiliating with lawyers in other states to handle cases outside of Massachusetts.

  • $7.7 Million Award for Feinberg & Alban Client in Personal Injury Trial

    Boston Attorneys Win Highest Injury Verdict in Massachusetts in 2011 & 2012.

Client Reviews
  • lawyers
    5.0/5.0

    Alexis Cahill represented me on a personal injury case. I was hurt in A car accident and I could not be happier with the outcome Alexis was able to achieve for me. She was conscientious, answered all my questions In a timely manner, and was very eas...

    Read more

    Client

  • google
    5.0/5.0

    I reached out to Feinberg & Alban thru their website. Robert Feinberg called me back the same day. He made me feel important and very comfortable. Colleen Santora was the attorney on my case and she was fantastic! She kept me well informed through ou...

    Read more

    Vern Quashie

  • google
    5.0/5.0

    Attorney Colleen Santora, was a pleasure to work with throughout my personal injury case. She makes the process seamless for her clients and is there to answer any questions you have. She negotiated every aspect of my case and got me the settlement I...

    Read more

    Cody

  • google
    5.0/5.0

    We were very pleased with all aspects of this law firm! My husband was struck by a truck while crossing the street. We hired attorney Colleen Santora of Feinberg & Alban PC. Colleen immediately showed empathy towards my husbands condition, aside fro...

    Read more

    Cleopatra Anderson

  • google
    5.0/5.0

    Attorney Colleen Santora assisted me after a terrifying highway incident. She came to my home because I was not able to travel, and she remained compassionate, professional, and highly competent throughout my case. I would highly recommend retaining...

    Read more

    Susan Hawes

See all reviews
Awards & Affiliations
Contact us

Quick Contact Form